| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
cbjazz |
Warning: this is pretty funny ... |
Lead | |
|
Hillary WASN'T LYING! Bosnia gunfire footage discovered...
|
|||
Progtronic |
|||
|
lol.. nice.
|
|||
ColonelLee |
|||
|
That is funny. What is even funnier is that Hillary is still in the race. Dems call Bush a liar? and they'll vote for this?
|
|||
Director Stan Arthur |
|||
|
What? You never heard of artistic license? Writer embellishemnt? C'mon! Everybody's doing it! It's OKAY!
|
|||
ColonelLee |
|||
Director Stan Arthur wrote: What was I thinking? Guess it was because there were tanks rolling through my neighborhood while I was typing my post and I was under heavy fire. |
|||
Steve Haugh |
|||
|
"What? You never heard of artistic license? Writer embellishemnt? C'mon! Everybody's doing it! It's OKAY!"
|
|||
Dirt Kahuna |
|||
|
Another example of artistic license: "Brownie, You're Doin' A Heck of A Job."
|
|||
That Guy David |
|||
|
> Dems call Bush a liar? and they'll vote for this?
Hillary's weaselly "faulty memory" on this is pretty insignificant deal. All politicians tell lies like this. Ask John McCain whether he ever considered leaving the Republican party, for example. Nobody died because of this bullshit, all that happened is somebody found an opportunity to make this hilarious video. Looking forward to the sequel, where she's drinking McCain under the table in the Ukraine, or something. |
|||
cbjazz |
This one is for David ... | ||
|
|
|||
cbjazz |
This one is my favorite though ... | ||
|
|
|||
ColonelLee |
|||
That Guy David wrote: Oh...I get it, David. All politicians tell lies like this. ah ha And nobody died. uh yeah.
David david david....I was born at night....just not last night....you out there on a limb with your defense of Hillary, man. |
|||
That Guy David |
|||
|
> All politicians tell lies like this. ah ha And nobody died. uh yeah.
Exactly, you do get it. > The point I'm making is. OK, now you don't get it again. Let me explain it real slow. All politicians, and all people, sometimes say things that aren't true. But not all lies are equally serious or have equally serious consequences. Simple, right? > defense of Hillary This is not a defense of Hillary. I didn't vote for her, right? Her campaign lately is looking for sharks to jump, saying all kinds of stuff as dumb as her sniper story, and the sooner she throws in the towel the better. This is attempt to help you understand why it is someone could disapprove of Bush's lying, yet still consider supporting Hillary. What you doing is drawing false equivalences, just like you accuse everyone else of doing. Lying is bad, but not all lies are equally bad. Some lies make you think "That's the worst president ever," but others make you think "WTF is she thinking? Well, at least she's not as crazy as McCain." Understand now? There's no contradiction there. |
|||
ColonelLee |
|||
David say....This is attempt to help you understand why it is someone could disapprove of Bush's lying, yet still consider supporting Hillary. What you doing is drawing false equivalences, just like you accuse everyone else of doing. Lying is bad, but not all lies are equally bad. Some lies make you think "That's the worst president ever," but others make you think "WTF is she thinking? Well, at least she's not as crazy as McCain." Understand now? There's no contradiction there. 1. Hillary lied 2. Hillary voted for the war in Iraq Today, Hillary tells us she would get the troops out of Iraq. But based on her record that is surely a lie.So..there is no false equivalency going on here. Yet, nearly half of the Dems are voting for Hillary. The contradiction shows how disingenuous the Democrat party really is. They will lie, say anything, no matter how stupid or blatantly false....to get power for their socialist agenda. |
|||
That Guy David |
|||
|
>there is no false equivalency going on here.
Sure there is. You're trying to equate Hillary's false sniper story with GWB's dishonest case for the Iraq war, and you are suggesting that those who criticize the latter should be equally upset about the former. This is false. The two things just aren't equally significant, and you shouldn't expect anyone to act as though they are. There's no contradiction between criticizing Bush and supporting Hillary. As for the rest, I don't know what you're even trying to say. Hillary (or is it the Democratic party, or the Democratic voters?) will say anything to get power for her/their "socialist" agenda, which is... keeping the troops in Iraq? Hillary's not getting the nomination anyway, so I don't think we need to sort that out. |
|||
ColonelLee |
|||
You're trying to equate Hillary's false sniper story with GWB's dishonest case for the Iraq war, and you are suggesting that those who criticize the latter should be equally upset about the former. This is false. The two things just aren't equally significant, and you shouldn't expect anyone to act as though they are. There's no contradiction between criticizing Bush and supporting Hillary.GWB's case for the Iraq War and Hillary Clinton's vote for the Iraq War were based on the same intel. I mean, you act as if Hillary Clinton has no complicity in the Iraq War at all. (which is you putting forth the same lie Hillary does) Hillary's lie about Bosnian sniper fire..is just indicative of all her lies. It's not her only lie. I won't list all her lies...but no one can doubt that Hillary is a liar. Every Democrat knows that Hillary is a liar. If they didn't before, they do now. But they are still voting for Hillary in large numbers. Hillary just won the primary in Indiana. Indiana Democrats want a proven liar who voted for the Iraq War as President. I think that is a more true indictment of the true motives and modus operandi of the Democrat Party than anything a Republican could ever say. |
|||
That Guy David |
|||
|
> you act as if Hillary Clinton has no complicity in the Iraq War at all.
No, I don't. She shouldn't have voted to authorize use of force. But it's not true that members of Congress had the same intel as the executive branch. Moreover, GWB and other members of his administration played a role in creating much of that false intel. You want to start assigning blame for starting the Iraq War? Hillary should be on the list, but nowhere near the top of it. > no one can doubt that Hillary is a liar. Sure, everybody tells lies sometime, and you can call anyone a "proven liar" if that's the game you want to play. But let me type this again for you: not all lies are equally significant, and there's still no reason to think people upset by George Bush's pre-war dishonesty should be equally upset by Hillary's sniper story. You think Hillary told some other lie that's worse? You don't have to list all of them, just one that had consequences comparable to thousands of lost lives and billions of wasted dollars. > I think that is a more true indictment of the true motives and modus operandi of the Democrat Party Well that's a problem with your goofball thinking, not with the Democratic Party or Indiana voters. But like I said, Hillary's not going to be the nominee. You might as well let go now, and work up some new material for your chain-yanking foolishness. |
|||